Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 313
1.
Pharm Biol ; 59(1): 1276-1285, 2021 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34517748

CONTEXT: Desloratadine, an H1 receptor antagonist, is suggested as an effective first-line drug for chronic urticarial (CU). However, the efficacy of desloratadine alone is limited, and the recurrence rate of CU is relatively high. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the efficacy and clinical feasibility of desloratadine in combination with compound glycyrrhizin in the treatment of CU. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in the databases of the China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, VIP, WanFang, PubMed, and Web of Science using subject terms: "Chronic urticaria", "Loratadine", and "Compound glycyrrhizin". Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficiency and safety of the combination treatment with desloratadine alone starting from January 1, 2014 until February 10, 2021 were selected by two co-first authors independently, and the extracted data were analysed using Rev Man 5.3 software. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs were included in our meta-analysis with a total of 1501 patients. The results showed that the combination treatment yielded a better treatment effect (total response rate: RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.29, p < 0.00001; cure rate: RR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.30 to 1.73, p < 0.00001), lower recurrence rate as well as superior immune improvement than the treatment with desloratadine alone. In addition, there was no significant difference in the safety of the two treatments. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The combination of desloratadine and compound glycyrrhizin is a promising treatment for CU and is associated with decreased serum IgE level and improved proportions of CD4+ T and CD8+ T cells.


Chronic Urticaria/drug therapy , Glycyrrhizic Acid/pharmacology , Loratadine/analogs & derivatives , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/pharmacology , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/cytology , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/cytology , Drug Therapy, Combination , Glycyrrhizic Acid/administration & dosage , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/administration & dosage , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/pharmacology , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Loratadine/administration & dosage , Loratadine/pharmacology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
2.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 110(2): 486-497, 2021 08.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33894061

Evidence from pain research shows that the effectiveness of active pharmacological treatments can be enhanced by placebo effects. The "open drug administration" is superior to "hidden drug administration.​" In a randomized controlled trial, we aimed to show that the targeted use of placebo effects increases the efficacy of an antihistamine (dimetindene) infusion in participants with atopic dermatitis. We openly infused dimetindene (drug) in full sight with information (intervention group 1: OPEN-DRUG+INST), openly infused drug with an additional classical conditioning learning experience (intervention group 2: OPEN-DRUG+INST+COND) or infused drug without any information or sight (i.e., hidden administration (control group 1: HIDDEN-DRUG)). Control group 2 received a placebo infusion (saline) declared as dimetindene and also experienced the conditioning experience (PLAC+INST+COND). Itch was experimentally induced with histamine via a skin prick test. Outcome was assessed at the subjective (primary end point: experimental itch intensity, numeric rating scale), and objective level (secondary end point: wheal size, mm2 ). Experimental-induced itch intensity decreased in all groups but at different rates (P < 0.001). The groups with the open administration, whether it was dimetindene or placebo, had significantly stronger reductions in itch compared to the HIDDEN-DRUG group (OPEN-DRUG+INST+COND: P < 0.001; OPEN-DRUG+INST: P = 0.009; and PLAC+INST+COND: P < 0.001). Additional drug conditioning mediated via expectation led to a stronger reduction of itching (P = 0.001). Results on wheal size were similar (P = 0.048), however, no significant difference between the HIDDEN-DRUG group and the PLAC+INST+COND group (P = 0.967) was found. We conclude that specifically generated targeted placebo effects can significantly increase the action of a drug (dimetindene) and should be used in clinical practice.


Dermatitis, Atopic/physiopathology , Placebo Effect , Pruritus/physiopathology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Conditioning, Classical , Dermatitis, Atopic/complications , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Dimethindene/administration & dosage , Dimethindene/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Female , Histamine , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/administration & dosage , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/therapeutic use , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Male , Middle Aged , Pruritus/chemically induced , Pruritus/drug therapy , Skin/pathology , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
5.
Pharm Res ; 38(4): 647-655, 2021 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33825113

PURPOSE: Fexofenadine is a well-identified in vivo probe substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and/or organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP). This work aimed to investigate the transplacental pharmacokinetics of fexofenadine enantiomers with and without the selective P-gp inhibitor fluoxetine. METHODS: The chiral transplacental pharmacokinetics of fexofenadine-fluoxetine interaction was determined using the ex vivo human placenta perfusion model (n = 4). In the Control period, racemic fexofenadine (75 ng of each enantiomer/ml) was added in the maternal circuit. In the Interaction period, racemic fluoxetine (50 ng of each enantiomer/mL) and racemic fexofenadine (75 ng of each enantiomer/mL) were added to the maternal circulation. In both periods, maternal and fetal perfusate samples were taken over 90 min. RESULTS: The (S)-(-)- and (R)-(+)-fexofenadine fetal-to-maternal ratio values in Control and Interaction periods were similar (~0.18). The placental transfer rates were similar between (S)-(-)- and (R)-(+)-fexofenadine in both Control (0.0024 vs 0.0019 min-1) and Interaction (0.0019 vs 0.0021 min-1) periods. In both Control and Interaction periods, the enantiomeric fexofenadine ratios [R-(+)/S-(-)] were approximately 1. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed a low extent, slow rate of non-enantioselective placental transfer of fexofenadine enantiomers, indicating a limited fetal fexofenadine exposure mediated by placental P-gp and/or OATP2B1. The fluoxetine interaction did not affect the non-enantioselective transplacental transfer of fexofenadine. The ex vivo placental perfusion model accurately predicts in vivo placental transfer of fexofenadine enantiomers with remarkably similar values (~0.17), and thus estimates the limited fetal exposure.


Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/pharmacokinetics , Maternal-Fetal Exchange/drug effects , Placenta/metabolism , Terfenadine/analogs & derivatives , ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B/antagonists & inhibitors , ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B/metabolism , Area Under Curve , Drug Interactions , Female , Fluoxetine/administration & dosage , Fluoxetine/pharmacokinetics , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/administration & dosage , Humans , Perfusion/instrumentation , Perfusion/methods , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications/immunology , Stereoisomerism , Terfenadine/administration & dosage , Terfenadine/pharmacokinetics
6.
Drug Deliv ; 28(1): 229-239, 2021 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33501873

PURPOSE: The work aimed to develop a co-loaded loratadine and sulpiride nasal nanoemulsion for allergic rhinitis management. METHODS: Compatibility studies were conducted adopting differential scanning calorimetry and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Nanoemulsion formulations were prepared using soybean lecithin, olive oil and tween 80. Sodium cholate and glycerol were employed as co-surfactants. Nanoemulsions were assessed for viscosity, pH, droplet size, polydispersity index, zeta potential, electrical conductivity, entrapment, In vitro drug release and corresponding kinetics. Stability of the selected formulation was investigated. The biological effectiveness was evaluated in rabbit models of ovalbumin-induced allergic rhinitis by measuring TNF-α, TGF-ß and IL-1. RESULTS: Compatibility studies revealed absence of drug/drug interactions. Nanoemulsions exhibited > 90% entrapment efficiency. The selected nanoemulsion demonstrated small droplet size (85.2 ± 0.2 nm), low PDI (0.35 ± 0.0) and appropriate Zeta Potential (-23.3 ± 0.2) and stability. It also displayed enhanced in vitro drug release following the Higuashi Diffusion and Baker-Lonsdale models. The mean relative mRNA expression of TNF-α, IL-1 and TGF-ß significantly decreased from 9.59 ± 1.06, 4.15 ± 0.02 and 4.15 ± 0.02 to 1.28 ± 0.02, 1.93 ± 0.06 and 1.56 ± 0.02 respectively after treatment with the selected nanoemulsion formulation. CONCLUSION: The results reflected a promising potent effect of the combined loratadine and sulpiride nasal nanoemulsion in managing the symptoms of allergic rhinitis.


Dopamine Antagonists/administration & dosage , Emulsions , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/administration & dosage , Loratadine/administration & dosage , Nasal Mucosa/drug effects , Rhinitis, Allergic/metabolism , Sulpiride/administration & dosage , Surface-Active Agents , Administration, Intranasal , Animals , Calorimetry, Differential Scanning , Disease Models, Animal , Dopamine Antagonists/pharmacology , Drug Combinations , Drug Liberation , Glycerol , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/pharmacology , In Vitro Techniques , Interleukin-1/metabolism , Lecithins , Loratadine/pharmacology , Nanostructures , Nasal Mucosa/metabolism , Olive Oil , Ovalbumin , Paranasal Sinuses/drug effects , Paranasal Sinuses/metabolism , Polysorbates , Rabbits , Rhinitis, Allergic/chemically induced , Sodium Cholate , Glycine max , Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared , Sulpiride/pharmacology , Transforming Growth Factor beta/drug effects , Transforming Growth Factor beta/metabolism , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/drug effects , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/metabolism
7.
Ocul Immunol Inflamm ; 29(7-8): 1621-1626, 2021 Nov 17.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32501774

Purpose: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of once-daily Alcaftadine 0.25% (AGN-229666) for prevention of signs and symptoms of Japanese cedar-pollen allergic conjunctivitis.Methods: This was a single-center, placebo-, and comparator-controlled study using the Ora-CAC® model of allergic conjunctivitis. The primary endpoint was ocular itching 16 hours after Alcaftadine 0.25% instillation; efficacy at 16 hours was compared with 0.1% Olopatadine, 4 hours after instillation. Secondary endpoints included conjunctival hyperemia.Results: 263 Japanese subjects were enrolled; 224 completed the trial. Alcaftadine 0.25% was statistically superior to vehicle for relief of ocular itching at 16 hours (p < .0001). Alcaftadine 0.25% at 16 hours was non-inferior to Olopatadine at 4 hours. Alcaftadine 0.25% was significantly better than vehicle for relief of conjunctival hyperemia. All treatments showed a low frequency of ocular adverse events.Conclusion: Once-daily Alcaftadine 0.25% is safe and effective in preventing signs and symptoms of Japanese cedar-pollen allergic conjunctivitis.


Benzazepines/administration & dosage , Conjunctivitis, Allergic/prevention & control , Cryptomeria/chemistry , Histamine H1 Antagonists/administration & dosage , Imidazoles/administration & dosage , Pollen/adverse effects , Administration, Ophthalmic , Adult , Allergens/adverse effects , Conjunctivitis, Allergic/chemically induced , Conjunctivitis, Allergic/diagnosis , Double-Blind Method , Female , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Olopatadine Hydrochloride/administration & dosage , Ophthalmic Solutions , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
8.
Acta Pharm ; 71(2): 317-324, 2021 Jun 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33151169

Terfenadine is a second-generation H1-antihistamine that despite potentially can produce severe side effects it has recently gained attention due to its anticancer properties. Lately, the subfamily 2 of inward rectifier potassium channels (Kir2) has been implicated in the progression of some tumoral processes. Hence, we characterized the effects of terfenadine on Kir2.x channels expressed in HEK-293 cells. Terfenadine inhibited Kir2.3 channels with a strikingly greater potency (IC50 = 1.06 ± 0.11 µmol L-1) compared to Kir2.1 channels (IC50 = 27.8 ± 4.8 µmol L-1). The Kir2.3(I213L) mutant, possessing a larger affinity for phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) than the wild-type Kir2.3, was less sensitive to terfenadine inhibition (IC50 = 13.0 ± 2.9 µmol L-1). Additionally, the PIP2 intracellular application had largely reduced the inhibition of Kir2.1 channels by terfenadine. Our data support that Kir2.x channels are targets of terfena-dine by affecting their interaction with PIP2, which could be regarded as a mechanism of the antitumor properties of terfenadine.


Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/pharmacology , Potassium Channels, Inwardly Rectifying/drug effects , Terfenadine/pharmacology , HEK293 Cells , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/administration & dosage , Humans , Inhibitory Concentration 50 , Potassium Channels, Inwardly Rectifying/metabolism , Terfenadine/administration & dosage
9.
J. investig. allergol. clin. immunol ; 31(4): 282-291, 2021. tab, ilus
Article En | IBECS | ID: ibc-215220

Background: According to current guidelines, oral antihistamines are the first-line treatment for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Up-dosing antihistamines to 4-fold the licensed dose is recommended if control is not achieved. Such indications are based mainly on expert opinion. Objectives: To critically review and analyze clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of higher-than-licensed dosage of second-generation oral antihistamines in the treatment of CSU. Material and Methods: A systematic literature review was performed following a sensitive search strategy. All articles published in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library between 1961 and October 2018 were examined. Publications with CSU patients prescribed secondgeneration antihistamines in monotherapy compared with placebo, licensed dosages, and/or higher dosages were included. Articles were evaluated by peer reviewers. Quality was evaluated using the Jadad and Oxford scores. Results: We identified 337 articles, of which 14 were included in the final evaluation (fexofenadine, 6; cetirizine, 2; levocetirizine and desloratadine, 1; levocetirizine, 1; rupatadine, 2; ebastine, 1; and bilastine, 1). Only 5 studies were placebo-controlled. The number of patients included ranged from 20 to 439. The observation lapse was ≤16 weeks. High fexofenadine doses produced a significant dosedependent response and controlled urticaria in most patients. Cetirizine, levocetirizine, rupatadine, and bilastine were more effective in up-dosing. The most frequent adverse events were headache and drowsiness. Conclusion: The low quality and heterogeneity of the articles reviewed made it impossible to reach robust conclusions and reveal the need for large-scale randomized clinical trials (AU)


Humans , Anti-Allergic Agents/administration & dosage , Urticaria/drug therapy , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Chronic Disease , Clinical Trials as Topic , Drug Dosage Calculations , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Treatment Outcome
11.
Curr Drug Metab ; 21(13): 1031-1039, 2020.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33109037

BACKGROUND: Desloratadine is a drug with a phenotypic polymorphism in metabolism and has been approved for use in many countries to treat allergic diseases. CYP2C8 and UGT2B10 are metabolic enzymes, which may be involved in the metabolism of desloratadine. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to demonstrate bioequivalence between the test product (desloratadine tablet) and the reference product AERIUS (5mg), both orally administered. And the role of UGT2B10 and CYP2C8 genotypes in healthy Chinese subjects with different Desloratadine metabolic phenotypes was examined. METHODS: It was a randomized, open-label, and four-sequence, single-dose crossover study conducted on 56 healthy Chinese subjects. The pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of the test and reference Desloratadine products were compared. UGT2B10 and CYP2C8 genotypes were determined by the TaqMan assay using genomic DNA. Multiple linear regression was applied to analyze the correlation between genotypes and the metabolic ratio. RESULTS: The mean serum concentration-time curves of desloratadine and 3-OH-desloratadine were similar between the test product and the reference product. For the PK similarity comparison, the 90% CIs for the geometric mean ratios of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ of desloratadine and 3-OH-desloratadine of test and reference product were completely within 80-125%. None of all 56 subjects had serious adverse events. Only 2 subjects were poor-metabolizers in 56 healthy subjects. There was no significant correlation between investigated genotypes of CYP2C8 and UGT2B10 and the metabolic ratio. CONCLUSION: The test desloratadine tablet was bioequivalent to the reference product. No direct relationship between CYP2C8 and UGT2B10 genotypes and desloratadine metabolic ratio was identified.


Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C8/genetics , Glucuronosyltransferase/genetics , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/pharmacokinetics , Loratadine/analogs & derivatives , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Area Under Curve , Cross-Over Studies , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C8/metabolism , Female , Glucuronosyltransferase/metabolism , Healthy Volunteers , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/administration & dosage , Humans , Loratadine/administration & dosage , Loratadine/pharmacokinetics , Male , Middle Aged , Pharmacogenomic Variants , Tablets , Therapeutic Equivalency , Young Adult
12.
Pharm Res ; 37(7): 131, 2020 Jun 17.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32557079

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Fluoxetine, antidepressant widely-used during pregnancy, is a selective inhibitor for P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Fexofenadine, an in vivo P-gp probe, is an antihistamine drug for seasonal allergic rhinitis and chronic urticaria treatment during pregnancy and it is available as a racemic mixture. This study evaluated the chiral discrimination of P-gp investigating the effect of fluoxetine on maternal-fetal pharmacokinetics of fexofenadine. METHODS: Healthy parturient women received either a single oral dose of 60 mg racemic fexofenadine (Control group; n = 8) or a single oral dose of 40 mg racemic fluoxetine 3 h before a single oral dose of 60 mg racemic fexofenadine (Interaction group; n = 8). Maternal blood and urine samples were collected up to 48 h after fexofenadine administration. At delivery, maternal-placental-fetal blood samples were collected. RESULTS: The maternal pharmacokinetics of fexofenadine was enantioselective (AUC0-∞R-(+)/S-(-) ~ 1.5) in both control and interaction groups. Fluoxetine increased AUC0-∞ (267.7 vs 376.1 ng.h/mL) and decreased oral total clearance (105.1 vs 74.4 L/h) only of S-(-)-fexofenadine, whereas the renal clearance were reduced for both enantiomers, suggesting that the intestinal P-gp-mediated transport of S-(-)-fexofenadine is influenced by fluoxetine to a greater extent that the R-(+)-fexofenadine. However, the transplacental transfer of fexofenadine is low (~16%), non-enantioselective and non-influenced by fluoxetine. CONCLUSIONS: A single oral dose of 40 mg fluoxetine inhibited the intestinal P-gp mediated transport of S-(-)-fexofenadine to a greater extent than R-(+)-fexofenadine in parturient women. However, the placental P-gp did not discriminate fexofenadine enantiomers and was not inhibited by fluoxetine.


Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation/administration & dosage , Fluoxetine/administration & dosage , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/pharmacokinetics , Intestinal Absorption/drug effects , Intestinal Mucosa/drug effects , Parturition , Terfenadine/analogs & derivatives , ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B/antagonists & inhibitors , ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B/metabolism , Adult , Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation/adverse effects , Case-Control Studies , Drug Interactions , Female , Fetal Blood/metabolism , Fluoxetine/adverse effects , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/administration & dosage , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/blood , Humans , Intestinal Mucosa/metabolism , Maternal-Fetal Exchange , Placental Circulation , Pregnancy , Terfenadine/administration & dosage , Terfenadine/blood , Terfenadine/pharmacokinetics , Young Adult
13.
Pharm Res ; 37(7): 133, 2020 Jun 28.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32596756

PURPOSE: To explain the different tabletability of two structurally similar H1-receptor antihistamine drugs, loratadine (LOR) and desloratadine (DES), based on the molecular basis of bonding area and bonding strength. METHODS: LOR and DES were characterized by powder X-ray diffractometry, thermal analysis, and dynamic water sorption. The compressibility, tabletability, compactibility, and Heckel analysis of their bulk powders and formulations were evaluated. A combined energy framework and topological analysis was used to characterize the crystal structure - mechanical property relationship. Surface energy of bulk powder was assessed by contact angle measurement using the Owens/Wendt theory. RESULTS: Both LOR and DES bulk powders are phase pure and stable under compaction. The superior tabletability of LOR is attributed to both larger bonding area (BA) and higher interparticle bonding strength (BS). The larger BA of LOR results from its experimentally established higher plasticity, which is explained by the presence of more densely packed molecular layers with smooth surface topology. The higher BS of LOR corresponded to its significantly higher dispersive component of the surface energy. CONCLUSIONS: This work provides new insights into the molecular origins of BA and BS, which can be applied to improve mechanical properties and tableting performance of drugs through appropriate crystal engineering.


Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/chemistry , Loratadine/analogs & derivatives , Administration, Oral , Crystallization , Drug Compounding , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/administration & dosage , Loratadine/administration & dosage , Loratadine/chemistry , Molecular Structure , Powders , Tablets
14.
J Microencapsul ; 37(6): 413-430, 2020 Sep.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32421463

Aim: This work aimed to develop topical nanoemulsion gels of cetirizine, a second-generation antihistamine, to avoid its oral intake drawbacks and enhance skin permeation.Methods: Cetirizine nanoemulsions were formulated and characterised for their particle size, polydispersity index, zeta potential, drug release and drug permeation through rat skin. The optimised formulation, obtained using 23 full factorial design, was incorporated in carbopol and chitosan gels and evaluated clinically for urticaria treatment.Results: The optimised formulation had particle size of 32.015 ± 1.87 nm, polydispersity index of 0.29 ± 0.04, zeta potential of -19.31 ± 0.43 mV, cetirizine percent released of 98.50 ± 1.23% and permeability coefficient of 7.65 cm.h-1. Cetirizine nanoemulsion gels were more effective than their control gels in urticaria treatment with significant decrease in the degree of wheals and itching and higher recovery percent.Conclusion: Cetirizine nanoemulsion topical gels are expected to be a rational and effective tool for avoiding cetirizine oral side effects and targeting the affected skin.


Cetirizine/administration & dosage , Drug Delivery Systems , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Animals , Cetirizine/chemistry , Cetirizine/pharmacokinetics , Drug Compounding , Drug Liberation , Emulsions , Gels , Humans , Male , Nanostructures , Particle Size , Pruritus/drug therapy , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Skin/metabolism , Young Adult
15.
Acta Oncol ; 59(9): 1103-1109, 2020 Sep.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32459128

BACKGROUND: As tumors maintain an inflammatory microenvironment, anti-inflammatory medication can be useful in cancer therapy. We have previously shown an association with improved survival in melanoma for use of the H1-antihistamines desloratadine and loratadine, and here we examine use of H1-antihistamines and breast cancer mortality. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We investigated use of the six major H1-antihistamines (cetirizine, clemastine, desloratadine, ebastine, fexofenadine and loratadine) and breast cancer-specific and overall mortality in a nation-wide register-based study of all 61,627 Swedish women diagnosed with breast cancer 2006-2013. Both peri- and post-diagnostic antihistamine use was analyzed using Cox regression models. Analyses were stratified for age and subgroup analyses based on estrogen receptor status and menopausal status were performed. RESULTS: We found a consistently improved survival of desloratadine users (HR = 0.67; 95% CI 0.55-0.81, p < .001), as well as of loratadine users (HR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.67-0.95, p = .012), relative to nonusers, regardless of patient age, menopause, estrogen receptor status or stage of the tumor, or whether breast cancer-specific or overall survival was analyzed. The survival of users of other antihistamines varied relative to non-users. CONCLUSION: Based on their safety and current use within the patient population, together with our observations, we suggest the initiation of trials of desloratadine and loratadine as treatment of breast cancer as well as studies of the mechanism behind their possible effect. Further studies on any effects of other H1-antihistamines may also be merited, as well as of H1-antihistamine use and survival in other malignancies.


Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/administration & dosage , Loratadine/analogs & derivatives , Breast/drug effects , Breast/immunology , Breast/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/immunology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Loratadine/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis , Survival Rate , Sweden/epidemiology , Tumor Microenvironment/drug effects , Tumor Microenvironment/immunology
16.
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev ; 9(7): 805-812, 2020 10.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32196954

Levocetirizine is classified as a second-generation antihistamine. Levocetirizine is available for the treatment of allergic disorders such as allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria. This was a single-center, single-dose, open-label, randomized, 2-way crossover study in healthy Japanese male subjects consisting of 2 parts. Part 1 compared the bioavailability of levocetirizine oral disintegrating tablet (ODT) and levocetirizine immediate-release tablet (IRT) taken with water in the fasted state in 24 subjects; all subjects completed this part of the trial. In part 2, the bioavailability of levocetirizine ODT without water was compared with that of levocetirizine IRT with water in the fasted state in 48 subjects; 47 subjects completed this part of the trial. Bioequivalence was demonstrated between levocetirizine IRT 5 mg and ODT 5 mg. The safety profiles were generally similar between levocetirizine ODT and levocetirizine IRT, with no serious adverse events, deaths, or adverse events leading to withdrawal reported during the study.


Cetirizine/pharmacokinetics , Chronic Urticaria/drug therapy , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/pharmacokinetics , Rhinitis, Allergic/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Adult , Cetirizine/administration & dosage , Cetirizine/adverse effects , Cross-Over Studies , Drug Compounding/trends , Healthy Volunteers , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/administration & dosage , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/adverse effects , Humans , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Safety , Therapeutic Equivalency
17.
Physiol Rep ; 8(5): e14385, 2020 03.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32147975

The macrolide antibiotic erythromycin has been associated with QT interval prolongation and inhibition of the hERG-encoded channels responsible for the rapid delayed rectifier K+ current I(Kr ). It has been suggested that low concentrations of erythromycin may have a protective effect against hERG block and associated drug-induced arrhythmia by reducing the affinity of the pore-binding site for high potency hERG inhibitors. This study aimed to explore further the notion of a potentially protective effect of erythromycin. Whole-cell patch-clamp experiments were performed in which hERG-expressing mammalian (Human Embryonic Kidney; HEK) cells were preincubated with low to moderate concentrations of erythromycin (3 or 30 µM) prior to whole-cell patch clamp recordings of hERG current (IhERG ) at 37°C. In contrast to a previous report, exposure to low concentrations of erythromycin did not reduce pharmacological sensitivity of hERG to the antipsychotic thioridazine and antihistamine terfenadine. The IC50 value for IhERG tail inhibition by terfenadine was decreased by ~32-fold in the presence of 3 µM erythromycin (p < .05 vs. no preincubation). Sensitivity to thioridazine remained unchanged (p > .05 vs. no preincubation). The effects of low concentrations of erythromycin were investigated for a series of pore blocking drugs, and the results obtained were consistent with additive and/or synergistic effects. Experiments with the externally acting blocker BeKm-1 on WT hERG and a pore mutant (F656V) were used to explore the location of the binding site for erythromycin. Our data are inconsistent with the use of erythromycin for the management of drug-induced QT prolongation.


Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , ERG1 Potassium Channel/antagonists & inhibitors , Erythromycin/administration & dosage , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/administration & dosage , Terfenadine/administration & dosage , Thioridazine/administration & dosage , Binding Sites/drug effects , ERG1 Potassium Channel/physiology , Erythromycin/chemistry , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Inhibitory Concentration 50 , Macrolides/administration & dosage , Macrolides/chemistry , Patch-Clamp Techniques
18.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 1490, 2020 01 30.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32001777

Recent reports suggest helper T-cell abnormalities in minimal-change nephrotic syndrome (MCNS), which often complicate allergic disorders that show a similar helper T-cell profile with Th2/Th17 predominance. However, the effect of anti-allergy therapy on MCNS remains unknown. This retrospective study included 51 patients with biopsy-proven MCNS recruited between November 2012 and October 2015, with follow-up through November 2017. We analyzed relapse and temporal daily corticosteroid dose with and without co-administration of histamine H1 receptor antagonist, cetirizine, and cysteinyl-leukotriene receptor antagonist, montelukast, as well as between baseline and after follow-up. Thirteen patients were treated with cetirizine and montelukast in addition to conventional therapy, whereas 38 patients were treated by conventional therapy only, consisting of corticosteroids and immunosuppressants. To adjust for baseline clinical characteristics, a 1:1 propensity score-matched model was applied. The clinical characteristics of the two groups after matching were similar at baseline. The treatment group showed a significant reduction in the lowest daily dose of oral prednisolone throughout the entire treatment course after the study compared to that of baseline (p < 0.025), which was not observed in the control group (p = 0.37), and showed significantly higher percentage of patients establishing corticosteroid-free state for the first time throughout the entire treatment course by addition of cetirizine and montelukast compared to the control group (p < 0.025). The study shows, for the first time, the steroid sparing effect of cetirizine and montelukast in addition to conventional treatment in MCNS patients with concomitant allergies.


Acetates/administration & dosage , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Cetirizine/administration & dosage , Hypersensitivity/complications , Hypersensitivity/drug therapy , Nephrosis, Lipoid/complications , Nephrosis, Lipoid/drug therapy , Quinolines/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Cyclopropanes , Female , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/administration & dosage , Humans , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Leukotriene Antagonists/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Nephrosis, Lipoid/diagnosis , Prednisolone/administration & dosage , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies , Sulfides , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
20.
Drug Dev Ind Pharm ; 46(3): 395-402, 2020 Mar.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31996053

Objective: The aim of this study was to develop medicated chewing gum (MCG) formulation for taste-masked levocetirizine dihydrochloride (LCZ) that can provide fast drug release into the salivary fluid.Methods: Taste-masked LCZ was first prepared by two methods: cyclodextrin complexation using Kleptose or Captisol and formation of drug resin complex using Kyron T-154 or Kyron T-314 to overcome poor LCZ palatability. MCGs were then prepared using the taste-masked drug, gum base (Artica-T, Chicle, or Health In Gum (HIG), plasticizer (glycerol or soy lecithin at 6 or 8% of the final gum weight). The developed MCGs were evaluated for physical properties, content uniformity, and drug release. Best release MCGs were evaluated thermally to investigate the plasticizer effectiveness and for ex vivo chew out study to confirm adequate drug release. Drug bioavailability was determined for selected formula compared to commercial tablets.Results: Based on taste-masking efficiency, drug/Kleptose complex (1:3 molar ratio) was chosen for incorporation into chewing gums. Physical properties and drug release showed that gum base type, plasticizer type, and level affected not only physical properties but also drug release from MCGs. Thermal study showed decreased glass transition temperature (Tg) with increased plasticizer level. Chew out study confirmed almost complete drug release after a few minutes of chewing. Pharmacokinetic results showed shorter tmax (0.585 vs. 1.375 h) and higher Cmax (0.113 vs. 0.0765 µg/mL) for MCGs than conventional tablets.Conclusion: Results provided evidence that MCGs could be a better alternative to conventional tablet formulations with improved bioavailability and enhanced palatability.


Cetirizine/administration & dosage , Chewing Gum , Excipients/chemistry , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/administration & dosage , Biological Availability , Cetirizine/chemistry , Cetirizine/pharmacokinetics , Chemistry, Pharmaceutical , Drug Liberation , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/chemistry , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/pharmacokinetics , Humans , Plasticizers/chemistry , Saliva/metabolism , Tablets , Taste , Vitrification , beta-Cyclodextrins/chemistry
...